Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Rockhampton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Early closure. czar ⨹   01:46, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

List of tallest buildings in Rockhampton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is unsourced: references just one commercial website that is not RS. The three tallest buildings in a city of 60, 000 is not sufficiently notable for its own article. Mark Marathon (talk) 23:45, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 25 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. None of these are either very tall or very notable. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 01:57, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * delete tallest building being only 14 stories is hardly noteworthy. LibStar (talk) 02:49, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a large enough city to have this sort of article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW, and per past outcomes. Bearian (talk) 17:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable. Metamagician3000 (talk) 13:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - WP:NOBITE. This article is a contribution by a new user who appears to be be making good faith contributions. I note that another of their new articles has been deleted on notability grounds, without any offers of assistance or advice to this new user. We need to attract and retain new editors if we are to reverse the decline in editor numbers, not chase them away. Kerry (talk) 22:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * You know I pretty strongly agree with you about this, but I think this article is unsalvageable. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 00:31, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  23:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.