Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Sejong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

List of tallest buildings in Sejong

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Sejong City is still very new and not yet a large city. It may well have notably tall buildings in the future but this is not guaranteed and any suggestion that it is guaranteed notability would be WP:CRYSTAL. I know that there is no definite line drawn as to when "List of tallest buildings in ___" become notable or not notable. I would say, however, that wherever we draw that line, this article must fall short of those standards. It fails WP:LISTN for multiple reasons:


 * Firstly, the list has no navigational purpose as the overwhelming majority of the buildings featured are not notable enough for their own Wikipedia article (it has 4 entries, none of them are notable buildings).
 * Secondly, this topic does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Database listings in Skyscraper Center do not constitute significant coverage.
 * I see no evidence that the topic 'List of tallest buildings in Sejong' is covered as a group by reliable secondary sources but I am happy to be proved wrong here.
 * Very few significant high-rise buildings under construction or even planned currently so little chance of future notability; no point in sending to draft.
 * The whole article is currently a violation of WP:OR

Similar AfDs for reference: Gwalior and Macon Spiderone  11:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails WP:LISTN does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS discussing this as a group. The city is not notable for tall buildings and the buildings on the list are not notably tall. The list does not meet WP:CLN, it does not assist in navigation, and does not serve any purpose under WP:AOAL.   // Timothy ::  talk  14:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough coverage. Orientls (talk) 18:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per precedence and the lack of relevance of this list. Geschichte (talk) 11:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW and my own standards. Bearian (talk) 20:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.