Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tattoo TV shows


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 07:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

List of tattoo TV shows

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG. This has been unsourced and in CAT:NN for 6 years. Boleyn (talk) 18:51, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Category:Television series set in tattoo shops exists and should be used instead.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 19:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence that this grouping is notable or encyclopedic. Deprodded by without explanation in May 2019.  –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 22:25, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * LaundryPizza03 placed that prod with a single word edit summary "prod". They showed good forbearance in not rushing straight to AfD when it was removed. Andrew🐉(talk) 06:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:LISTPURP and WP:NOTDUP as navigational index; we clearly have plenty of articles on TV series that are about tattooing, as seen by the contents of this list as well as Category:Tattooing television series and its subcategory Category:Television series set in tattoo shops. The nom User:Boleyn is regrettably on autopilot with these same-same, WP:VAGUEWAVE nominations that fail to raise the right questions for this kind of list of articles (notwithstanding what WP:LISTN and WP:WHYN say regarding navigational lists). postdlf (talk) 00:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: I think this is a keep based on WP:CLN: "Accordingly, these methods should not be considered in conflict with each other. Rather, they are synergistic, each one complementing the others" It doesn't mean it must be kept, but it does state: "Consider that lists may include features not available to categories, and building a rudimentary list of links is a useful step in improving a list. Deleting these rudimentary lists is a waste of these building blocks" There isn't a time limit on it and someone may decide to build on this. Since its a legitimate list per WP:LISTN it has been discussed in pop culture press, , , , and I don't see why I should be deleted when WP:CLN says "Deleting these rudimentary lists is a waste of these building blocks"  // Timothy ::  talk  02:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The topic meets WP:LISTN – for example, see the Encyclopedia of Body Adornment. Q.E.D. Andrew🐉(talk) 06:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - a fine navigational list corresponding to Category:Tattooing television series. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 14:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Being six years old is not a reason to delete. Nom needs to stop citing this as a reason, and consider that if most of their nominated lists are being kept, they might not share the consensus interpretation of WP:LISTN. pburka (talk) 20:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.