Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete not only per WP:SNOW but as fundamentally too open and unmaintainable. Daniel Case 19:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

List of technologies

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is mostly just a list of completely random words such as boob, dustpan and yatzee (sic). Furthermore any real technologies are better categorized by the Wikipedia categories they are already in. KelleyCook 20:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Copper? Dustpan? Boobs? It's just a random collection of articles not involving persons, as far as I can see. -- Charlene 21:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be an extensive list of random words. I really don't see how this is useful. TheCatalyst31 22:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Isn't the template and categories enough? A separate repetitive article like this which is possibly incomplete is not necessary.--JForget 22:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete LOL, what is this?  "list of loosely associated topics" - WP:NOT Corpx 02:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, this could be made into a category, maybe. But this list isn't really all that maintainable and would be extraordinarily long.  Actually, it's already pretty long.  Useight 07:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Any list that lists together "COBOL" and "Electric chair", and "Umbrella" and "Pound-force", has to be good for comedic value, but I'm not sure how a list of technologies could be made. It'd be too wide a topic. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.