Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tennis players who appeared on the David Letterman Show in 1995


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 23:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

List of tennis players who appeared on the David Letterman Show in 1995
Delete this non-notable list, only claim to notablity is due to an article on Meta, which is a self reference. Prod removed, so moving to AfD. Transfinite 17:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to violate WP:POINT. NawlinWiki 17:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Borderline nonsense. Really tempted to speedy.  Creator is certainly violating WP:POINT.  Wickethewok 17:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Insanely over-specific. A person should try to see if a generalized List of tennis players who appeared on the David Letterman Show would work before dividing by year. (And I don't think it would even though I like lists)--T. Anthony 18:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. shotwell 18:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This one is just silly. 23skidoo 18:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I really hope that the creation of this list is an excercise in WP:POINT, not a genuine attempt at useful encyclopedic article. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to violate WP:POINT. Hello32020 19:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete uhhh. Danny Lilithborne 20:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and WP:DAFT. Grutness...wha?  22:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Obscure, obscure, obscure... EVula 22:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to be an attept to make inclusionists look dumb, and reeks of WP:POINT. For what it's worth, it doesn't seem to be mentioned in the Meta article that it claims it's mentioned in.  Delete either way. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  00:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Not that my opinion is needed here (I think the outcome is obvious), but this is f***ing idiotic. Delete. -- Kicking222 02:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Strike this vacuous frivolity. Sm1969 11:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete two entries don't make it a list. --- User:Docu


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.