Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the Ships of the Central Galactic Navy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  T 00:23, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

List of the Ships of the Central Galactic Navy
Insignificant personal universe, not noteworthy 128.100.138.41 17:55, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense Ashibaka (tock) 19:03, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Personal universe that's involved in no published stories in any media and has no following on or offline.--Sindai 20:30, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete original research/unpublished fiction. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 22:48, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Again, just because it is smaller than other scifis doesn't mean people don't care. It isn't nonsense, we authors did a lot of research and development for the CGU storyline, and we've worked for two years on the basics. Just because it is obscure doesn't mean it doesn't exist at all. the reason the stories aren't published YET is because PyroPics can't find any good publishers.


 * Well, you'll just have to keep looking for a good publisher, then. I wish you luck. Delete. Andrew Levine 01:37, 24 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not a hosting service. -Falcorian 04:10, 24 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not a place for your fanwank universe. -User:Lord Azrael 5:40PM 24 Nov 2005


 * Delete Falcorian is right. And I notice that Hapsie enjoys posting this is any forum he meets, pretty much. User:MJ12 Commando
 * Delete but let's keept things polite. Durova 07:26, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not the place to publish new material.. Srl 10:19, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

-Alex, Confederate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.220.157.93 (talk • contribs)
 * Well, thank you andrew and durova for at least being polite to me on this issue, unlike the everyone else, especially the government.
 * Delete as original research. Turnstep 20:33, 24 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete as original research. &mdash; RJH 01:01, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


 * I've already voiced my opinions for the other articles; as for this article, I move to Delete as well. - User: 24.9.10.235
 * Delete. Preaky 07:10, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Izehar 22:25, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.