Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the busiest air routes in Australia by passenger traffic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Aviation in Australia. Suggesting merge per the discussion presented by and. Thanks for assuming good faith and for your participation! Missvain (talk) 16:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

List of the busiest air routes in Australia by passenger traffic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is a content fork. There are no other articles by country that are relating to this topic. Interstellarity (talk) 23:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 01:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Selective merge to Aviation in Australia as an alternative to deletion. The idea of the list is encyclopedic (WP:NOTPAPER) and should be kept somewhere, but the standalone list article is a mess given it's reliant on single sources. The main article on aviation in Australia only contains a history section and nothing else, and would be ideal to have some lists on domestic and international civil air routes currently. The list article can be significantly pruned there to something manageable so I'm not suggesting all of it be recreated in the Aviation in Australia article. Bookscale (talk) 08:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 23:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge selectively as suggested. It's a heuristic that whenever an article is sourced by a single primary source, it is de facto original research. Bearian (talk) 18:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.