Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the most popular Quran Aloners

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was content was merged with Quran Alone

List of the most popular Quran Aloners

 * I supported Quran Alone and even Edip Yuksel of questionable notability (based on his past popularity in Turkey), but this article is inherently POV (popular?) and... oh man... gren 29 June 2005 12:30 (UTC)


 * Quran Aloner- I believe this is an excellent article to inform the people of the important figures who believe in Quran Alone. Btw u say that you supportED Quran Alone. Have you changed your beliefs? If yes, then what do you believe in now?


 * Oh, to clarify I mean the creation and allowance of the article Quran Alone once it had been created. I did not mean I support it as a religious view.  I do find it to be interesting within Islam and I have read about it, but I am not it. If you are going to cast a vote in favor it is best to bold the word keep and put it at the beginning of your entry.  I don't think a list of Qur'an aloners is a good idea, especially in terms of "popularity". gren 29 June 2005 13:09 (UTC)


 * At the very least, the POV complaint is valid; this information can be copied into Quran Alone.DS June 29, 2005 13:00 (UTC)


 * Delete - The Quran Alone article is enough - there is no need for this separate list unless everyone on it is notable in some way. Naturenet | Talk 29 June 2005 13:14 (UTC)


 * Merge to Quran Alone and redirect (for GFDL purposes, can't merge and delete) Proto t c 29 June 2005 13:56 (UTC)


 * Delete, no redirect Somebody removed the VfD notice, too. I've restored it. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd June 29, 2005 15:40 (UTC)
 * Delete unnecessary list, as per Starblind. JamesBurns 30 June 2005 03:20 (UTC)
 * Delete I fail to see the point of having a list of (popular?) "Qur'an Aloners" on Wikipedia. --Zeno of Elea 30 June 2005 03:24 (UTC)
 * KEEP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.130.57.122 (talk • contribs) 06:12, 30 June 2005

This article should be kept coz unlike mainstream Muslims who follow hadith these guys are totally peaceful and also in my view much more rational and logical. If you only came to know these guys you would change your mind immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.130.57.122 (talk • contribs) 06:12+, 30 June 2005


 * I would not say mainstream Muslims are not peaceful. They aren't bad people, they just aren't notable... we can't say "hey these are good guys, let's give them an article and remove those of Zarqawi" because, that's not how encyclopedias work.  Hitler will always have a bigger article than Saint Stephen.  gren 30 June 2005 12:33 (UTC)

Quran Aloner- I dont like that view. Ok if you mean criticism of Hitler, then let the article be as long as can be. Every group or religious faction should have one article and a few of it's popular followers especially the very peaceful ones.


 * Merge to Quaran Alone though famous might be a better criteria than popular. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish June 30, 2005 16:03 (UTC)


 * Delete - Promotional article of non-notable group. Same attempt seen in insertion of promotional text in many other articles. --Ragib 30 June 2005 22:06 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to Quran Alone- The list does mention notable Quran Alone people -- user:idmkhizar
 * Haven't you already voted thru 84.130.85.101, which from this diff seems to be your IP? --Ragib 5 July 2005 15:46 (UTC)


 * Delete. Self-promotion. NoPuzzleStranger July 6, 2005 18:50 (UTC)


 * Redirect. I have already merged content into Quran Alone. func (talk) 8 July 2005 03:35 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.