Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the world's busiest airports by international passenger traffic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was No Consensus. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 20:05, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

List of the world's busiest airports by international passenger traffic
Does not appear to be needed, no indication of the source of the data. No support to keep in WikiProject Airports. Vegaswikian 06:40, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - don't trust whatever data is used. London gets separate entries for Heathrow and Gatwick, but Paris and New York get only single entries. CLW 07:11, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. If there is no source, find one and replace it. Listing airports by international passenger traffic is important to aviation statistics.--Huaiwei 09:38, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge as a sub-category of World's busiest airports by passenger traffic, or Delete as per above ; changed my mind, just merge (also, forgot to sign). PRueda29 09:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge or keep, this is exactly the kind of thing people would come to wikipedia for. Kappa 10:27, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Arbitrary lists of poorly verified statistics? I think you're confusing this with what you come to Wikipedia for, PReuda. / Peter Isotalo 04:55, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge or keep as per Kappa, it should go somewhere, if you cant verify it than keep it until someone can. Astrokey44 11:15, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge or keep, but only if verified, with references. Passenger numbers would be nice too. --A bit iffy 11:47, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Would expect a list for domestic passenger traffic too. &mdash; Instantnood 14:34, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Verify, then merge as above. 23skidoo 15:35, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge or keep, cleanup and verify. Andrew pmk | Talk 17:27, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Mostly agrees with the list in the 2005 World Almanac, but the Almanac combines international and domestic figures. An exact reference would help, but let's not rush to delete. Owen&times; &#9742;  17:46, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge it probably can't grow any more so merge would be best. Job  E  6  [[Image:Peru flag large.png|20px]] 00:55, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * It is possible to grow, because normally, there are annual figures for such data. I agree that we can merge it for now thou until we can expand it later and warrant a split.--Huaiwei 01:23, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * It should deserve its own page, but right now its just an empty list... it's too barren to deserve its own page. It looks like something that belongs as a sub-category in a larger article.  It doesn't even have prose, it's just a list.  If it can be expanded to look more article-like, then I'll change to keep, but right now, merge is the best choice. PRueda29 01:56, 25 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Listcruft and/or statisticscruft. / Peter Isotalo 04:55, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. *drew 07:36, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge or keep, useful information. Christopher Parham (talk) 05:23, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's verifiable and wiki isn't paper. It doesn't come under any point at What Wikipedia is not. ··gracefool |&#9786; 17:56, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources.  Page doesn't indicate which year it's supposed to apply to.  Obviously what wikipedia really needs is List of the world's busiest airports by international passenger traffic in 2004, List of the world's busiest airports by international passenger traffic in 2003, .... Quale 07:52, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.