Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of things named after Donald Trump


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Both delete !votes are WP:IDHT, Anyway overwhelming consensus to keep (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:56, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

List of things named after Donald Trump

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Trivia. This is redundant to Googling "trump -election". KATMAKROFAN (talk) 23:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:14, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:14, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment. This might have some use as a navigational aid. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Good point. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:51, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Rename "List of assets owned by The Trump Organization and remove portions of this article that do not correlate. Otherwise, no, delete. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 04:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep no real rationale presented by the nom. Technically ALL articles on here are redundant to Googling the topic.  Lugnuts  Precious bodily fluids 08:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems utterly pointless to me. As noted above, is it clear they're actually named after Donald Trump and not some Trump corporation? From a WP:GOLF point of view, it seems unlikely anyone would be interested in a list of golf clubs/courses with the word Trump in the name. Nigej (talk) 14:30, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep It would seem to be a bona fide member of Category:Lists of things named after politicians. Now, it's obviously unusual in that all the entries to date would probably have so named prior to him becoming the Republican nominee for President of the United States, but I don't see how that invalidates the list. And yes any pruning can be done via normal editing. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per Lugnuts and Shawn. --SI 17:34, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep – "Things named after Donald Trump", as trivial as it may sound, does seem to be a notable topic. See: an elementary school, things, companies, even burgers and a chair have generated coverage because they were named after Donald Trump. Appears therefore to be a valid list topic. Not all of these are assets owned by The Trump Organization, although most are. Mz7 (talk) 03:26, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * After the arguing to delete at Articles for deletion/Donald Trump's hair, I would like to temporarily retract this argument to think about it a little more. I think DarthBotto's line of thinking is definitely worth considering. Mz7 (talk) 17:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep ...and an easy keep too. I see guidelines like WP:CSC and WP:LISTN that indicate this list is alright. Plus, the AfD reason is not a valid one at all.Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Leaning Delete because these are not "Things named after Donald Trump" but rather things that "Carry the Trump brand". Some of them are things that the Trump organisation licensed, some that it owns and / or built, but they are not all named after Donald Trump. Otherwise, they would say "Donald Trump Tower" for example. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep – This was forked out to unclutter the main Donald Trump article some time ago. If we delete, it will reappear in short order. Besides, it's a handy summary that does no harm. — JFG talk 08:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, variety of things in this list, everything from brands to buildings and everything in between. Clearly meets WP:NLIST. May need re-titling, current one is a bit stiff.--Prisencolin (talk) 22:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:NLIST requirements.LM2000 (talk) 11:23, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep if re-named: I agree with DarthBotto. I think this would work better as a list of his assets than how it is currently being used. Plus the deletion argument is invalid; given how prominent his position in politics has become, one would likely want to know about his business activities. ViperSnake151   Talk  00:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep because of the back story on the split, but prune of entities without articles, as in only listing the cities. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:08, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Rename per above. It is also a valid list, considering how loose the criteria for lists is currently in Wikipedia. Ceosad (talk) 11:57, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep current name -- I'm seeing coverage that discusses how, for example, home owners are petitioning to have their "Trump" buildings renamed, due to concerns about valuations or (even) their friends not coming to visit because of the name on the front of the building. There have been polls that asked people "Would you be more likely or less likely to purchase things / stay at hotels that bear Trump's name"? So "things named after Donald Trump" is becoming more of a topic of its own. See for example:
 * Donald Trump’s D.C. Hotel Shows His Brand Is Sinking Along With His Poll Numbers, New York Magazine: "If Trump hoped his campaign would elevate the value of his brand, it looks like just the opposite is happening."
 * Nearly 40% of Consumers Say They Will Shun Trump Businesses, Fortune: "Morning Consult, a polling and market research company, surveyed a national sample of 1,983 registered voters, and it found nearly four out of ten voters said that Trump’s campaign for president would make them “less likely” to buy Trump-related products. Only 17% said it made them more likely."
 * I believe this would be a continued topic of discussion after the election, so it's worth preserving the list as it's currently named. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.