Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of three-named celebrities


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete --Anthony.bradbury"talk"  22:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

List of three-named celebrities

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article seems to he a pointless list of celebrities who include their middle names in credits etc. I see no purpose for this article and believe it should be deleted.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 22:10, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. These are loosely associated people and the list is potentially gigantic and inherently POV to the extent contributors decide which three-named people have "celebrity" status and thus can be included.--Fuhghettaboutit 22:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete What a stupid waste of space, per WP:LISTCRUFT --  Chil dzy  ¤  Ta lk  22:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - completely pointless. -- Roleplayer 23:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Andy Scriminett Liszt... Delete Not even worth doing as a category. Some people just prefer to go by three names.  The three kids with nine names on Home Improvement was the height of this phenomenon. Mandsford 00:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is pretty much what "indiscriminate" was made for. Artw 04:56, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, very indiscriminate list. Using one's middle name doesn't make one notable. J I P  | Talk 12:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as indiscriminate information. No attempt is made to explain why using three names is significant, probably because it isn't. Iain99 18:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, although the title on its own is rather amusing. • 97198  talk  07:29, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete absolutely useless and unmaintanble and also mainly restricted to the US. --JForget 22:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.