Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of titles by Pink Pineapple


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. I'm hesitant to close an AfD less than a day after it was opened, but the comments in this discussion are convincing and it's unlikely that keeping this discussion open for the whole seven days will change the direction of consensus. If anyone disagrees with this closure, feel free to leave a message at Deletion review. (non-admin closure) Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

List of titles by Pink Pineapple

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No parent article for Pink Pineapple; could be G8 subpage deleted but decided to leave this in more knowledgeable hands Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  02:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  02:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - While many of the titles they released are not notable, enough of them are blue-linked to make this worthwhile as a navigational list per WP:LISTPURP. Also, this is absolutely not a candidate for WP:G8 speedy deletion, and I am shocked that Ten Pound Hammer as an experienced editor doesn't seem to know what a subpage is.  There is nothing in the deletion policies that would allow a list of a company's works to be deleted just because that company doesn't have an article.  No valid deletion rationale has been presented. Calathan (talk) 02:58, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Calathan makes a good case. This is a valid list article.   D r e a m Focus  03:49, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - yes, enough of this company's work is notable that this list is useful and "encyclopedic" in nature. - Richard Cavell (talk) 10:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Richard Cavell (talk) 10:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - The company its-self is not notable but many of it's works are. I don't think getting rid of a useful navigation list is the best idea here, a category or template might be preferred though. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.