Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top World Champions in WWE by combined length


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

List of top World Champions in WWE by combined length

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

nn listcruft for how long professional wrestlers held titles in a predetermined outcome. This info is very crufty, redundant, and is not needed here. There are already plenty of related pages (questionable in notability) that exist for this info. Prod was removed. Biggspowd 00:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Whsitchy 00:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as indiscriminate. Ohconfucius 10:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The information is constantly changing, arbitrarily selected and genuinely disinteresting. McPhail 15:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft. What in the Sam Hill is this, anyway? Realkyhick 22:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was going to suggest to merge the information to List of WWE Champions, but I'm not sure how important the number of days a person held a title is. That list already has the date that the person won the title, and the date that the following person won the title, so the time is already mentioned there. The question remains if the number of days is necessary. If so, then merge and delete this page. Pepsidrinka 19:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:UNENC clause 9. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 21:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Elrith 04:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.