Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top earning travel companies in the United States


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

List of top earning travel companies in the United States

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is simply the recreation of another source's list, including its rather bizarre set of metrics (the list would include a company that did $100 million in business, of which $15 million was in the US, but not one that did $100 billion in business, of which $14 billion was in the US.) Those strange metrics keep it from meeting WP:NOTESAL Originally created by a undisclosed paid editor, the list is based on a single, heavily-outdated source. If the Travel Weekly list was in itself notable, that would call for not a list article, but an article discussing the history and impact of their list (such as done for The Black List (survey).) Note that Travel Weekly is just a redirect to the company that publishes it, and even that page is tagged for notability issues. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:00, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete – arbitrary inclusion criteria, US-centric, depends on a single source which is not itself notable. Stifle (talk) 16:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Odd combination of either OR or straight copyvio, the list seem to have odd parameters as described also. Oaktree b (talk) 17:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Lists,  and United States of America.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete lack of multiple independent sources means this is basically plagiarism Dronebogus (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. Appears to be original research/copyvio, plus probably doesn't pass WP:LISTN anyhow. Ajf773 (talk) 10:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I’m not sure you can copyright data. Dronebogus (talk) 23:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * You can in some contexts, though it's not relevant here. Stifle (talk) 09:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --  Devoke  water  16:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.