Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Budapest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow keep. There was no community support for this AfD. Nominator: please remain civil and nominate wisely. (non-admin closure) gidonb (talk) 00:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

List of tourist attractions in Budapest

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a travel guide. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  10:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:46, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:46, 7 September 2018 (UTC)


 * See also Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Helsinki. --Doncram (talk) 22:10, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. wp:NOTTRAVEL does not apply.  It is about inclusion of telephone numbers and recommendations/ratings and other minutiae relevant only for travellers, which seems not encyclopedic.  ("An article on Paris should mention landmarks, such as the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre, but not the telephone number or street address of the "best" restaurants, nor the current price of a café au lait on the Champs-Élysées. Wikipedia is not the place to recreate content more suited to entries in hotel or culinary guides, travelogues, and the like.") This is a serious list-article on the major historic sites and other, yes, tourist attractions.  I think all have articles and hence have been deemed wikipedia-notable individually.  It is fine for a list-article to group them together and provide guidance to readers.  I found my way just now to interesting article about shoes monument on the riverbank.
 * I hope this is not the beginning or middle of an uninformed, kneejerk campaign to attempt to rid Wikipedia of all tourist attractions, or lists of them. If there are more AFDs like this already they should be linked.  If more are opened then an administrative proceeding to stop the deletion nominator wasting our time and wp:CIR should be considered. --Doncram (talk) 18:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * It even includes how to get there by tram. That is a travel guide. There are no more afd's than this, but I will nominate articles that fail WP:NOT. And shut up with your I dont like this so you should be getting a block. And not all tourist attraction articles are bad, List_of_tourist_attractions_in_Amsterdam only names the attraction and a description no longer than 1 sentence. No how-to-get-here things. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  20:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:LISTN. Andrew D. (talk) 21:13, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep If List of tourist attractions in Amsterdam is OK, then I don't see anything here that merits deletion. Cleanup and reorganization, maybe, but that's not what AfD is for. For me, statements about which metro lines are the closest can be acceptable in principle: not too subject to changing quickly and becoming outdated information, not prone to individual whims or matters of taste. But I wouldn't object to excising them. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 00:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per all the above. No valid reason to delete. --Michig (talk) 07:26, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. The list itself isn't a travel guide, it's a completely valid list of important landmarks in the city. However the columns about closest metro station or tram line is a travel guide and should be removed from the article. Ajf773 (talk) 11:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment. In fact this nomination should have been closed with "Speedy Keep" as the nomination does not supply a reason.  I voted "Keep" also at Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Helsinki. --Doncram (talk) 22:10, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you blind? Shadowowl on mobile (talk) 22:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.