Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Chandigarh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Chandigarh. There is no consensus on merging to a specific section within the article, so please use common sense in accomplishing the merger appropriately. (non-admin closure) — Mhawk10 (talk) 06:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

List of tourist attractions in Chandigarh

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Policies violated by this page:

WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."

WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.

The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.

WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.

WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:34, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:GNG. A notable topic, about a popular tourist city. Enough coverage. Venkat TL (talk) 11:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to Chandigarh. I think these are appropriate things to list, but perhaps better in context. Reywas92Talk 17:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Merge to Chandigarh major places and attractions list should be merged. —  B203GTB    (talk)  • 14:28, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Chandigarh: Much better as part of the city page. Gusfriend (talk) 06:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to Chandigarh without redirecting to a specific section; some of it can be included in culture, others in landscape, etc. The article shouldn't be kept however as Wikipedia is not travel guide. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 09:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.