Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Darbhanga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per G5 (Weareme234). Closing as page was deleted, but this AfD closure does not preclude a non-sockpuppet re-creating the article or merging. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 21:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

List of tourist attractions in Darbhanga

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Wikipedia is not suppose to be a guidebook. Govvy (talk) 12:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

It is not fully completed need more things. Simply nominating for deletion. 14:19, 06 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge to Darbhanga. Discussion on landmarks, cityscape, and historic places is needed on that article, not chopped off to a separate page. It is in no way long enough to require a split. Reywas92Talk 18:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, or merge per Reywas92. I've never liked the use of phrases such as "tourist attraction" or "visitor attraction", which I find subjective compared to "landmark", though I understand there are ENGVAR issues there. Regardless, the title seems to be the nom's sole basis for objection, because Wikipedia does in fact cover what notable landmarks are located in particular places. Doing that does not make this a "guidebook". postdlf (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.