Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Helsinki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) gidonb (talk) 23:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

List of tourist attractions in Helsinki

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NOTTRAVEL. Includes promotional text without sourcing like most famous, renowned, certainly worth a visit, popular, easy to recognize and classic tourguide things like This area is suitable for day trip hiking &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  20:39, 7 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:LISTN.  If particular phrases seem inappropriate, this can be addressed by ordinary editing.  AfD is not cleanup. Andrew D. (talk) 21:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:20, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 * See also Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Budapest. --Doncram (talk) 22:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per Eastmain. Issues can obviously be addressed by editing. --Michig (talk) 07:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Helsinki. Every single bit is unsourced and needs a citation. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 07:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I made a first pass through for encyclopedic tone. I don't see fundamental problems with what remains; claims about "popularity" can be sourced, for example. Since the entries are blue-linked, inline citations in this article aren't immediately necessary, although they might be convenient. I mean, I don't think we need a footnote right away to demonstrate that the Natural History Museum of Helsinki exists. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 15:23, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: I see the problems with the page, and that's why I've been working on restructuring it in this sandbox. Let me know if you have any feedback about the sandboxed list. Citations are on the way. —Rutlandbaconsouthamptonshakespeare (talk) 19:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * That looks nice! XOR&#39;easter (talk) 21:12, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nonsensical nomination.  Of course promotional text can be addressed by editing.  See also Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Budapest.  If the deletion nominator nominates more of these they should be banned from AFD, IMHO.  --Doncram (talk) 22:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - We seem to have such lists for other cities so this list wants improvement and not deletion. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.