Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of town council members of Chapel Hill, North Carolina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

List of town council members of Chapel Hill, North Carolina

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As with Articles for deletion/List of alderpersons of Carrboro, North Carolina, comprehensive historical lists of town or city councillors in individual cities simply aren't a thing we do on here. A person wouldn't pass WP:NPOL for this role in and of itself, so it's mostly a list of non-notable people because normally the only way a person would actually have an article to link to is if they went on to hold office at the state or federal levels. And even places like New York City, where the city councillors are considered to pass NPOL because the city is so large and internationally prominent, still don't actually have lists like this. No prejudice against creation of an article about the city council itself, if one can be substanced and sourced, but a list of the past city councillors all the way back to the 1800s just isn't a thing we need. Bearcat (talk) 14:46, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:52, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:54, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete if the individuals don't pass WP:NPOL in their own right, then their notability cannot inherited either from these types of list articles. Ajf773 (talk) 18:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. How does this pass WP:LIST? Bearian (talk) 02:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.