Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of town tramway systems in Asia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. (non-admin closure) David WS (contribs)  17:17, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

List of town tramway systems in Asia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Indiscriminate list that may never be complete Fatal!ty (T☠LK) 09:45, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, indiscrimate how? and so what if it *may* never be complete? let's delete wikipedia too, on that basis. Juzhong (talk) 12:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions.   —Juzhong (talk) 12:30, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.   —Juzhong (talk) 12:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * And why are you picking on the Asian tramsways anyway. Go delete the American trams too Juzhong (talk) 12:33, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. I found it quite informative. And Juzhong's comment about deleting Wikipedia on that basis is spot on. TopGearFreak   Talk  13:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep -- One function of lists of this kind is to idenifiy articles that are needed, usually by the article having redlinks. This one just has blank spaces at present.  Because tramways require rails, the list is potentailly finite.  However there are many lists in WP tagged "incomplete list", and there is no reason why this one should not be so-tagged: tagged for incompleteness and improvement is all that we need.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep has clear inclusion and exclusion (i.e. Japan) criteria with links to the related content in other regions. Seems a perfctly acceptable use of a list unless I'm missing something. StarM  14:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as per everyone but the nominator. Edward321 (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.