Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of transport museums


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 22:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

List of transport museums
This article is not notable enough to appear on wikipedia, and should be deleted or possibly merged. Delete (my nomination). Robin99 22:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It's well-organized, well-researched, and contains numerous blue links. SFTVLGUY2 22:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks like something useful for the hobbyist or other person interested.--Wehwalt 22:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Unlike many "lists" this one won't grow into infinity and it covers very specific and exactly defined topic. Pavel Vozenilek 22:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Museums are of encyclopedic value. Lists of them all over the world are also.--Oakshade 23:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep clearly notable subject matter which can be trivially confirmed. There are multiple newspaper and television reports on transport museums as well as many scholarly research articles written about them. No policy basis for this nomination, hence my speedy keep recommendation. Gwernol 23:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. It is notable, and it isn't just an indiscriminate list. Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  00:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - not indiscriminate, not overpopulated, and well-organized (by country). -- Black Falcon 00:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - list topics are generally better served by categories, but the listing by country makes this one somewhat more useful than the relevant category page. AdorableRuffian 22:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Though not thrilled by this one, the criteria for inclusion is clear. If the list becomes unwieldly it can be split into sub-lists by country. WjBscribe 05:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as this is a valuable list. (jarbarf) 19:59, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.