Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of trivia from Pulp Fiction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 22:20, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

List of trivia from Pulp Fiction
A whole article about trivia isn't needed at all. Per WP:TRIVIA, and Avoid trivia sections in articles, this page doesn't belong. RobJ1981 16:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Pulp Fiction invites so much trivia (I've indulged in an edit or two myself) that it almost seems like this article should exist as an intentional stopping point on the way for these tidbits headed towards removal. Metaphorically send all the trivia to this article, slam the door shut, ignore any screams you hear. - Richfife 16:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge anything useful and notable back into the original article. Note that WP:TRIVIA does not prohibit trivia sections in articles. What needs to be done is the most important/notable trivia needs to be picked out and, if possible, integrated into the main article text. 23skidoo 16:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge. Agree with 23skidoo. Can't decipher Richfife's comments. Please rewrite in clear English.Ward3001 18:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply I could tell you what I meant, but then I'd have to kill you. - Richfife 06:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply to Reply I assume, then, that your Delete statement is not to be taken seriously. Ward3001 18:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Trivia sections are bad enough in the main articles, never mind giving them separate ones. Integrate and rewrite the most encyclpaedic points into the article, in context, and shoot the rest down in a big lexical blood bath. The JPS talk to me  19:33, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: this "list" was obviously ripped off from the main article with hope to keep the main text clean. Merge it and damage the main text, delete it and the cruft will start to grow in the main article immediatelly. See Category:In popular culture for working examples how to effectively deal with cruft in current structure of Wikipedia. Pavel Vozenilek 23:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and consistently remove the trivia from this section. I don't see how "people are going to add it" is a reason to let it stay on site so much as a reason to patrol the main article and ensure it stays clean. GassyGuy 08:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete A lot of this material is available at IMDB's trivia page and doesn't fit in an encyclopedia. Interesting read though.
 * Merge: Some of this is relevant to the main page,though a lot of it is garbage.Desdinova 19:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Zepheus &lt;ツィフィアス&gt; 05:24, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete; trivia = trivial = unencyclopedic. I'd suggest merging any relevant information into Pulp Fiction (film), but none of it is referenced. Extraordinary Machine 15:17, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Trivial Delete! Widefox 01:48, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.