Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of two-letter English words


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus, and No discussion that ties this to applicable policy. ~ trialsanderrors 02:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

List of two-letter English words

 * — (View AfD)


 * Transwiki, then delete - Though I am an avid Scrabble fan and see the utility of this page, this should probably be Transwiki'ed to Wikitionary. Djma12 20:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Danny Lilithborne 22:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki/Delete unlike the other article, this one has legitimate English words. Ditch the scrabble section as it is a)irrelevant b)quite possible a copyvio. Koweja 00:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Legitimate encyclopedic content. This is something that one would not expect to find in a dictionary, but rather in some sort of encyclopedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Newyorkbrad (talk • contribs) 00:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC).
 * Comment See also AfD for analogous three-letter page. DMacks 03:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge-in-part. This page (unlike the three-letter one) seems to have some actual content in addition to being a simple list. If delete, then some of the later sections discussing scrabble rules and changes to them should be merged into Scrabble. DMacks 03:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This list includes important linguistic information and does not take much of Wiki's space. It does NOT violate WP:NOT and should stay. It is used by many as a starting point to research acronyms. There are many uses for these lists, for example, people looking for new names for computer communication protocols, for new products (including software products), marketing brands, linguistic trends and much more. --Gabi S. 06:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. If need be, remove the Scrabble sections and add them to the respective articles for the Scrabble dictionaries.  It would appear this list is more useful for Scrabble players than for people just looking for two-letter words. - Bricks J. Winzer 11:47, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm sure many readers will find this very interesting just like I do, and it does not violate any rules.  --Zerotalk 12:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki This article is very usefull, but not for wikipedia. Send it to wikibooks FirefoxMan 16:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I feel this article contains interesting information, more so than when I last looked at it (joys of Wiki). I don't see what makes it unencyclopedic (nominator hasn't said). Martin 19:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki Words are not notable or important for the number of letters that they have. —ShadowHalo 20:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, add each individual word's page on Wikitionary to an x-letter words category. Noclip 20:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.