Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of types of proteins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  07:19, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

List of types of proteins

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a case for TNT. The subject is certainly sensible, but the article is in a dreadful state. It's peppered with random definitions and quotations, unsourced, and often just general bits of cell biology with no particular connection to proteins. The referencing is dismal. Many items in the list don't lead anywhere (no link, no idea what they would link to anyway). The hierarchies of the list, if it has any, are very unclear, so it doesn't really organise the material in any useful way. I think this was a good idea in the distant past that's got lost, and it's time to get rid of it and start again. This is related to a current AfD on List of proteins in the human body Elemimele (talk) 07:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Blank and Redirect to Protein as an ATD, to preserve history while the future of the article is considered. I completely agree with WP:TNT. Of interest is that the article has barely changed since 2005, so it's no surprise it's not up to 2023 standards, but there's no need to delete history here. &mdash;siro&chi;o 08:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing to add to what Elemimele (talk) said, with which I completely agree.  Athel cb (talk) 09:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's certainly not appropriately cited, and it would need radical work in all aspects to get it up to current standards (and current biology). Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect either to Protein or List of proteins. I can't see the list ever being useful, because as the page incoherently tries to show, there are many different ways of classifying proteins.  It's like making a list of types of businesses, inherently a mess. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 17:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete The protein article does it better. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 17:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete The current content is practically unusable, this article needs completely starting from scratch, if it is required at all. GraziePrego (talk) 06:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment As a potential alternatve to this list, consider List of proteins. Perhaps a few parts of this list could salvaged and merged into this other list. (Ducks head) Boghog (talk) 15:34, 25 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete article is unreadable gibberish Dronebogus (talk) 14:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC)


 * delete, even if the topic is notable it can't be salvaged from the current list. Artem.G (talk) 17:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment. I assume someone wanted to create a list based on Gene Ontology. See for example and . This is a legitimate list, but is it helpful as a WP page? I am not sure. My very best wishes (talk) 22:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.