Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of uncertainty propagation software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

List of uncertainty propagation software

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Spammy list of non-notable entities, Wikipedia is not a product directory * Pppery * it has begun... 20:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mathematics, Software,  and Lists.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see any links to Wikipedia articles in there, just links to external sites.  D r e a m Focus  21:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as per XOR&#39;easter, improving the list to cover (some of) the programs appropriately does not seem practical. Keep. According to WP:NLIST, individual items in a list need not be notable, while the category the list is about does. As the category is already covered in its own article and is criticized as spammy/indiscriminate, less notable entries should be culled as per WP:LSC. Holzklöppel (talk) 22:16, 31 December 2023 (UTC) edited 03:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Propagation of uncertainty isn't about the software. No software is mentioned at all.  Category:Lists of software shows how the many other lists of this type work, they list notable software that has its own Wikipedia articles.  This list is old.  Has any of the software listed on it gotten its own articles yet?   D r e a m Focus  00:43, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The software listed implements the concept described in the article and should probably be wikilinked there. If lists of software on Wikipedia were just lists of Wikipedia articles covering software, deleting would be in the interest of consistency, but a cursory look at the category indicates otherwise. Outdated information should be corrected by editing. I don't know if any of the programs covered are notable enough to have an article. Holzklöppel (talk) 01:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC) edited 03:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of sources that indicate this particular feature to be a noteworthy thing to organize software by, and the lack of secondary references to support the claims being made on behalf of these obscure tools/packages/scripting languages. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.