Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unreleased Brandy Norwood songs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Courcelles 23:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

List of unreleased Brandy Norwood songs

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unverified lists like this are massive copyright violations. Note how many of the references link to blogs (unreliable sources), and YouTube. Much of the information is speculated and not notable under WP:NSONGS. Any notable songs would have been mentioned in the discography of the artist and/or relevant pages. This page is nearly entirely constructed by searching ASCAP/BMI and listing all of the songs which come up. In reality this is not WP:V and not factual thus it does not have a place in an encyclopedia. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  23:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 18 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NSONGS and WP:CRYSTAL. If a song has not  been released, it cannot  have gained notabillity, the main  criterion  being  that  of its position  in  the charts. The only  exception would be bootlegs that  have reached sufficient  notoriety to  have been extensively  reported in  the press. It's a shame to  delete this because a lot of work  has gone into  it. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:04, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutral – The article looks pretty good to me. I think if the unreliable sources were removed, the article would be able to hold itself up. If it can't be done, my vote will be changed to delete. ℥nding · start 05:19, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep – The article is sourced and absolutely similar to the list of unreleased Britney Spears songs or the list of unreleased Michael Jackson material, both of who are featured WP lists. Otherwise, those would have to be deleted, too???
 * The difference is that a lot of these are sourced from blogs. ℥nding · start 20:27, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Because those which are featured lists, use much better sourcing than the junk listed here. In fact the Britney and Michael Jackson list use biographies amongst various other published materials. This does not. WP:WAX. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  20:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * And a blog or publishing database is no source?


 * Keep looks good to me. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:29, 23 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep The list is just like the other unreleased songs list. Also everything is sourced. So relevancy. check. quality check. hence KEEP 85.181.123.168 (talk) 20:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.