Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unusual drainage systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  13:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

List of unusual drainage systems

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:LISTCRIT and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. "Unusual" is not well-defined and so there isn't any particular inclusion criteria. Jasper Deng (talk) 07:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. No real list criteria as to what an 'unusual' system is, and no references to provide notability for the list. Ajf773 (talk) 09:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Geography.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  11:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete subjective.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 18:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Explain: From 22oct23 Casiquiare canal, Echimamish River and Manych River were deleted and moved to River bifurcation. Some others were moved to Lake bifurcation or deleted. This made the remaining list useless and deletible.The original reason for the list was that, given something like the Casiquiare canal, the reader would want to know if there were similar oddities. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 02:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.