Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of victims of the Rock Springs massacre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Rock Springs massacre. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

List of victims of the Rock Springs massacre

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per WP:NOT and WP:MEMORIAL. Having a separate list for this adds nothing to the topic. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. No need for a list of non-notable victims. Other articles beginning with "List of victims," where such victims are all or mostly non-notable, redirect to the articles on the events in question, but this is unlikely to be a search term. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 19:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete on grounds that Wikipedia is not a memorial site. My sympathies to the relatives of those involved. Carrite (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - I dont care if it is deleted or merged or kept, but I cant see the harm in it being kept either.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:39, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * See WP:NOHARM. Also, your recommendation is contradictory, saying both "keep" and "I dont care if it is deleted or merged or kept". RichardOSmith (talk) 13:00, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - There is no need to be deleted.Calvin Marquess (talk) 05:10, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  —Michaela den (talk) 12:25, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge into Rock Springs massacre This is not a expandable list, so a formatted embedded list into the main article would alleviate the formatting disaesthetics.Curb Chain (talk) 09:08, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment - Bingo! This is 100% right on the money. Carrite (talk) 23:30, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.