Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of villains (second nomination)

List of villains (nomination # mmmm..1..2..3..4.. whatever)
This list potentially contains approximately 50% of all characters in popular culture. It survived a previous VfD (above) but it has now grown to incredible length, to the point where as far as I can see it serves no useful purpose. Suggesitons re encyclopaedic content (adding sources, etc.) in the original VfD have been ignored, so it is just a list. A very long list. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 15:51, 25 November 2005 (UTC) Ps: By the way, there is never a substancial number of of readers.
 * Keep The statement that it is "Just a list" is misleading. The "Historical figures who figure as villains in fiction" section contains several hundreds of words of prose. It is obviously of value to a substantial number of users, and if it is deleted some of them might be annoyed and leave, and then they will never contribute to articles that you do value. CalJW 18:04, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Change! That's what i've been talking about, Just zis Guy, y'know! check out my changes, im triing to evolve this page by categorizing the list, the next spep would be to evolve the categories into pages, the same proces would probably happen to this pages, and so on. You are totally right, there is a reason why this page is so bad, it seem to be "owned" by some guys known as turnstep an jossie or something, and the want to keep is a some sort of super-duper-cartoony-crazy-mega-cool list of villains. When ever there is a 'consseal*'(*i think im misspelling), apparently the only opinions that count is theirs. So there are no changes or deletions. Check out my categories, i want people to check them out and helpme fill em with the characters from the old list. If it isn't available on the article, you can check it by recoverin my last changed my version on the history saction, or the one before the two 'rulers' changed it. --T-man, the Wise Scarecrow 18:22, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Agree with most of Just zis Guy's comments, but I still like it. AndyJones 18:29, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment On checking the last nomination closed less than a week ago with around a 75% vote for keep. I therefore consider this renomination inappropriate. When you don't get the result you want, please accept it and move on to something else. CalJW 18:36, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Did it? Are you sure?  The one on the Talk page was 2004, unless I'm much mistaken.  Hang on... - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 19:12, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Bollocks, you're right. Sorry about that.  I'll clean up...
 * Change! Take in consideration that normal pages don't get nominated on a regular basis. Think about it for a second. There must be a reason. And the reason is tha to most people expecting to read enciclopedic articles the list is an insult with all kind of crazy mixtures; a mess with no organization at all...Check the mobsters list to get a nice example of a well done encyclopedic organization of information.
 * And there is no such thing as an inapropiate nomination. This one was made by a person that is new to the page, so it is valid. And has been happening for awhile. Besides most people who think this article is stupid don't care about the page, so they wouldn't waste time triing to debate with the people obsesed with the page.Once again think about it--T-man, the Wise Scarecrow 03:09, 26 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete and categorize the information. —Cleared as filed. 06:56, 26 November 2005 (UTC)