Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of w00tstock shows


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

List of w00tstock shows

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pure WP:LISTCRUFT. Furthermore, this list fails WP:GNG. Tchaliburton (talk) 04:15, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. This article is less than thirty minutes old, but it's essentially material moved from the main w00tstock article. This no way qualifies as listcruft, as it is absolutely no different than the myriad of lists of episodes of tv shows, concert events, etc. The notability of the topic is well established in the parent article, and if need be sources can be copied from there to here. Agent 86 (talk) 04:28, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:11, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:11, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. I got one hit for "w00tstock" on Highbeam, and that's just a drive-by mention on CNN. There is also this, this, and this. I checked the press coverage secton on the subject's website, so this list should be pretty complete. In short, w00tstock itself just barely passes GNG. The Satanic Sheik (talk) 13:34, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Update. There are more hits if you search for wootstock. But it's just the dates of upcoming events, nothing GNG. The Satanic Sheik (talk) 06:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete whether or not w00tstock itself is notable (dubious), this list of performances is not. Being articles, stand-alone lists are subject to Wikipedia's content policies, such as verifiability, no original research, neutral point of view, and what Wikipedia is not, as well as the notability guidelines. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Stand-alone lists. This list is non-encyclopaedic, and almost directory in nature. See also WP:INDISCRIMINATE. There is no claim to notability for this list. See also WP:EVENTOUTCOMES and WP:OUTCOMES? --Bejnar (talk) 15:34, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wootstock should go to afd too. Both NN. Szzuk (talk) 18:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.