Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of warrior archetypes that can be used online


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

List of warrior archetypes that can be used online

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod was removed by the author without further improvement. I don't know what improvement can help. This is a fairly arbitrary list that comes off as original research by the author. Nothing new is gained by having this list, and someone has already tagged it for context because it is rather confusing just what this list is supposed to achieve. - BierHerr 22:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Entirely original research. Even if there were reliable sources, it should probably be merged into Pirates versus Ninjas, which needs a lot of work, itself.Chunky Rice 22:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I had originally placed the prod tag. Original research, no context and I can't imagine how this could ever become an encyclopedic article. I also advise against a merge to Pirates versus Ninjas: if any info is worth salvaging (and I doubt this very much) then it will eventually be added in Pirates versus Ninjas whereas forcing a merge will just downgrade the readability of the article. Pascal.Tesson 22:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, I wasn't advocating a merge. I was just saying that if this information is verifiable (which it doesn't appear to be), then it should go on that page.Chunky Rice 22:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete not patent nonsense, but I will call it absolute nonsense. I mean. look at it. JuJube 04:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.