Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wars involving Nepal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

List of wars involving Nepal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing of value here. WP:LISTCRUFT plain and simple. No sources, no linking templates (unless you count help me) Was de-proded without explination. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Though rudimentary and WP:IMPERFECT, it appears to be a bona fide member of Category:Lists of wars by country and as the main list for, you guessed it, Category:Wars involving Nepal. Keep Through his mistaken use of the talk page template help me, the article creator appears to have been asking for help with his list. Of course, what he got was something very different. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - clearly notable subject, current state of article is adequate, no reason to delete that I can see. Smmurphy(Talk) 20:37, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:LISTN and Category:Lists of wars by country shows that a consensus that this type of list is useful is well established. Lack of cited sources is surmountable, and lack of templates (?) is not a rationale for deletion, nor is the inexperience of the article creator. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 20:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: this is standard type of article, see for example: List of wars involving Spain and many others. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Needs a lot of work, but that's not the point. The subject is notable. Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - The Himalayan Tibet/Chinese/Indian/Nepal interface has produced a larger array of military history relevant subjects than are here - needs keep and further development JarrahTree 01:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep -- A harmless little article. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:LISTCRUFT is an essay -- not a policy based argument for deletion. The topic is likely widely covered and cited by other encyclopedias and meets our criteria for WP:LISTN. Mkdw  talk 17:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.