Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of winners of the Comrades Marathon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:26, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

List of winners of the Comrades Marathon

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The information is repeated in a collapsible table at the bottom of the article Comrades Marathon. The article gets about 5 views a day compared to 130 for the latter. JMK (talk) 20:52, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 4.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  21:04, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. A separate article suffices, as putting it in the marathon article will make it longer than it should be. –BuickCenturyDriver 23:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - as stated above, info is already in the "parent" article, and I don't think we need a separate article to list winners almost none of whom seem to be notable, given the absence of blue links -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 22:43, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:42, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - Is clearly redundant as the same list is already in the main article about this event. So, I see no reason to keep this as a standalone list article. MakeSense64 (talk) 10:50, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Information is already in the main article and there is no reason (main article is only 31.3KB. That's nowhere close to needing splitting up as BuickCenturyDriver suggests.) to have it as a separate article.  Grandmartin11 (talk) 18:43, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. As already argued, the same information is already present at the article for the marathon itself, and there is no reason to split this into its own, redundant article.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:37, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.