Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of word puns where one or more of the included words is used in whole


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

List of word puns where one or more of the included words is used in whole
Idiosyncratic fork of List of miscellaneous portmanteaus, with the odd criteria that "one or more words are whole" and therefore not actually portmanteau words, a prerequisite I've never heard of. Brought to you by the creator of List of songs whose title starts and ends with the same letter and the future creator of (if the redlinks at List of portmanteau word lists are to be believed) List of word puns with numerals and List of word puns that only truncate only one letter in any of its etymological words. Calton | Talk 05:17, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Add creator to "List of people who have nothing better to do than to create nonsensical lists" and delete this. Kimchi.sg | talk 05:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a fan of this list which I view as part of an indiscriminate collection of information. -- Samir  [[Image:Canadian maple leaf 2.jpg|20px]]   (the scope)   धर्म  05:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Listcruft.  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   06:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as listcruft. --Icarus 06:17, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN Would be interesting to look at who spent their time doing all this. SandBoxer 07:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * That would be this fellow.--Calton | Talk 07:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It'd probably be better at WP:DAFT than WP:BJAODN, too. Grutness...wha?  01:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Useless listcruft.--Cini 08:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete some list are use full, but this is not (list creep).-- blue 520  09:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft must be expunged and it must be expunged soon.   Proto    ||    type    09:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bad joke here.-- 陈 鼎  翔    贡献  Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 10:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete because Danny Lilithborne 11:49, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft. --Ter e nce Ong 13:07, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Powerdelete with inherent deletion. Just not encyclopedic.  Maybe some specialized linguistics text could use some discussion about the topic of the nominated list (I doubt it), but Wikipedia certainly isn't the right place.  Barno 13:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete do I even nee dot justify this vote? --Bachrach44 19:56, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Might be worthy of a category.  Arctic Gnome 21:40, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete- listcruft. The El Reyko 21:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Exterminate and pour salt over the article so it won't ever rise again -- Hirudo 04:10, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete This is Listcruft - Aeon 05:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.