Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wrestlers in WWE video games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Withdrawn by nominator with no additional discussion. (non-admin closure) &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  00:56, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

List of wrestlers in WWE video games

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This entire page violates WP:FANCRUFT and it must be removed.  JC  &middot; &#32; History &middot; &#32; Talk &middot; &#32; Contributions 03:24, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. Well, WP:FANCRUFT is an essay, not a policy or guideline.  That's not a valid reason to delete a page.  I understand your frustration with the amount of pop culture trivia that is on Wikipedia, but we shouldn't go around deleting pages simply because we don't like them.  I haven't done anything but skim through the first half of this article, but you might be able to make an argument based on WP:NOT or WP:N that this is an indiscriminate collection of information based on a non-notable topic, but that's just my gut feeling, and it's not based on any informed research. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Procedural close/speed keep No policy-based argument for deletion was presented; only an WP:IDONTLIKEIT rationale. The WWE video games are very notable at the very least. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 11:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak delete - Generally, per WP:NOT, lists of rosters in video games are generally not included. If there was however noted interest from secondary sources in the breadth or general inclusion of wrestles in the series, that would be reason to keep. If this is kept, I would argue to revise the approach to the list, as to use a table format, putting the wrestles in rows and games in columns and showing what games they are in; that would cut down the size and be a bit more useful to follow. --M ASEM  (t) 01:49, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Withdrawing as per discussion. Using my knowledge of the subject, I will revise the article and seek appropriate references.  JC  &middot; &#32; History &middot; &#32; Talk &middot; &#32; Contributions 07:18, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.