Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of yellow pages


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__.  Sandstein  08:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

List of yellow pages

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This list is almost wholly unreferenced, and almost none of the list entries have their own articles. Given yellow pages are rapidly disappearing in most places, it seems like it would be difficult to reconstruct a series of references, and the length of the list would make that quite a task anyway. AntiDionysius (talk) 06:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Lists.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  11:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Largely WP:OR, fails WP:NOT. Possibly notable subject, but requires WP:TNT due to its current state regardless. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. Seeing as to how an excellent case has been made for the page's deletion, and seeing how this page so desperately would requires major overhauls of an impossible nature per WP:DYNAMITE, this article neither manages to comprehensively accomplish any aspect of its initial purpose in an orderly manner nor does it, in any way, shape or form, justify the extraordinary efforts which would be required in fixing all the problems contained within. Excellent nomination, I must say - this is one of the strangest pages I believe I've ever come across, and to think it went unnoticed for so long is rather astonishing. Alas, when a page (particularly directorial listings) can neither justify its initial existence - let alone to the active nature that this encyclopedic project is geared towards - then it cannot survive on Wikipedia... and seeing as to how, per WP:REDUNDANT, the page offers extremely low encyclopedic value to anyone in any form, this page definitiely deserves to be deleted. TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 18:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.