Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of younger and junior versions of cartoon characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:11, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

List of younger and junior versions of cartoon characters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This AfD is something of a last resort. I actually think the articles are notable topics, but the first article reads like egregious trivia because most of it is unsourced (even though I do agree with most of the examples). I tried deleting the unsourced material but that got reverted; and the second article (below) has the same problem but with no sources at all. I then thought about merging or redirecting the articles, but I don't know what the target article should be (animated character redirects to Character (arts) but neither animated character nor animation is mentioned in that article at all).  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 23:11, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 23:19, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - the inclusion is overly broad. It may as well be List of Flashbacks. The Star Wars prequels aren't even a cartoon. Babyfication may be notable enough for an article, but this list is useless. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, postdlf (talk) 18:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Both - Trivia, fancruft, and no sources. 47.208.20.130 (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 7 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. OR. How about characters that wear red? Or non-human? Or human? Or gender bender? Or flying? Or... random fan list. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.