Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Listings of india


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus appears to be that the topic is not notable at this time. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Listings of india

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Plenty of press releases, but I'm not sure if that's enough for notability. Adam9007 (talk) 00:38, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi,Yes I agree, there are to or three press releases, but that's not amount to the notability of the organization. I was doing a research on the scope of Multiple listing service in Inida. It works on Internet Data Exchange technology. In India, its new to Real estate business, but having a huge business scope. In India, so far, there Listings of india is the only Multiple listing services company to establish centralized Real Estate property database. I am a regular contributor to Wiipedia, thought that this article would make Wikipedia more stronger. There are some references that I managed to gather from Intellectual Property of India, attached in the page as well. If we improve some of the contents to keep this article, would be great. I am pretty sure, this article would be very much helpful to many people of concern in India. (Dhananjay Singh (talk) 01:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC))
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:04, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:26, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as it stands, no RSes actually about the company - David Gerard (talk) 11:13, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.