Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of protected heritage sites in the German-speaking Community of Belgium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 19:44, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Lists of protected heritage sites in the German-speaking Community of Belgium

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a list of lists, category pages, if properly labelled should be enough for this, as they do the same task. Daiyusha (talk) 05:11, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, per WP:NOTDUP. Lists and categories complement each other, each with different functions. That they overlap is not a reason to delete. This one in particular is not a beautiful list, but you can add useful information to it that you can't add to a category. Images, information about how many such sites are in each area, what kind of site, etc. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:23, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:41, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:42, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:42, 17 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Lists of lists are useful and not against guidelines or policy. There is even a category for them and also guidelines for creating them here WP:LISTOFLISTS. Dom from Paris (talk) 07:07, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's beyond me why people even want to bring things like this to AfD. SpinningSpark 15:04, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. It could be improved, including that perhaps the separate lists do not need to be split out, but that is not a reason to delete.  The deletion nominator needs to read and consider wp:CLNT. --Doncram (talk) 18:22, 17 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.