Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lita Fontaine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Lita Fontaine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of an artist, making no strong claim of notability that would satisfy WP:ARTIST and resting entirely on primary and user-generated content sources except for a single news article by the CBC — one reliable source, however, is not enough to satisfy WP:GNG. As always, an artist does not get an automatic entitlement to keep a Wikipedia article just because she exists. Delete unless the sourcing and content can be majorly beefed up. Bearcat (talk) 22:16, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now with no good move target and my searches found nothing particularly substantial here, here and here. SwisterTwister   talk  04:38, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   15:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep. There is fairly extensive coverage here, some coverage here (a paragraph), a mention here, a small paragraph here, and a few more mentions in the Winnipeg Free Press (which I didn't look at, since it requires a log-in and submitting email address). If the closing admin decides to keep it, write something on my talk page and I'll try to fix up this article.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:19, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 20:54, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing in that article is notable. Looks like a resume of name, education, employment.  Heyyouoverthere (talk) 21:38, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.