Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiteSpeed Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted WP:G11. (non-admin closure) M assiveYR   ♠  13:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

LiteSpeed Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, which makes a non-notable web server. I can't find any WP:RS for this company. Most edits are by the same cluster of WP:SPAs which have been maintaining the related articles for their products. See also WP:Articles for deletion/OpenLiteSpeed and WP:Articles for deletion/LiteSpeed Web Server. I'm listing this separately from the server article because it's plausible the server itself is notable (even though I wasn't able to find any good sources myself), but the company sure isn't. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  13:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  13:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  13:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as unambiguous promotion on a private company with no indications of notability or significance. 100% advertorial content. The article is cited to unsuitable sources and consists largely of trivia, such as:
 * "It is now used by 2.9% of all websites according to W3Techs, maintaining its spot as the 4th most popular web server!"
 * I'll request a deletion under G11; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.