Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Literary Juice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:06, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Literary Juice

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No apparent notability for this small online magazine. The review in ref 2 counted on to show notability says in effect that it isn't notable yet.  DGG ( talk ) 09:29, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. "[Founder Sarah Rajan] cited search engine optimization as a key concept in the magazine’s continued success." (Source)  This Wikipedia article was obviously created as a part of the campaign to promote her work. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Besides the promotional nature, I should mention that it's not notable. I was unable to find any sources beyond those already discounted by DGG.  Even if the review isn't discounted, the other source (The Observer) is a student newspaper, which I don't think is good enough to establish notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:44, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Agree with nom and NinjaRobotPirate. Promotional in tone with little, if any, coverage. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 19:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.