Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lithuania–Luxembourg relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — A itias  //  discussion  19:26, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Lithuania–Luxembourg relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another completely random combination. non resident embassies. only coverage of relations is in a multilateral context, only thing I could find is 1 minor usual double taxation agreement. . French search yields nothing too LibStar (talk) 14:35, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete User:Plumoyr has a history of creating such articles with no real substance or point. a little   insignificant  14:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Obsessive-compulsive article creation coupled with no attempt at establishing non-existent notability. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  18:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. Drawn Some (talk) 19:34, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not much here-- there was an incident ten years ago where both nations had UN peacekeeping forces in Serbia, and the Lithuanian guy and the Luxembourgian guy both had the "L" beaten out of them by some overzealous Serbian cops... speaking of trivia, another news article notes that there are nine world nations that begin with "L" and these are two of them.  Be the 10th caller to name the rest of them and I'll be impressed. Mandsford (talk) 23:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability test. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 06:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Foreign relations of Luxembourg which now contains the content. Aymatth2 (talk) 03:05, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Foreign relations of Luxembourg. Most of these articles are merge candidates, and as such do not belong at AfD. Rklear (talk) 05:37, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mandsford. Stifle (talk) 12:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No reasonable sources that discuss these relationships. Hipocrite (talk) 04:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.