Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lithuanian Ley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 00:29, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Lithuanian Ley

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

original research. References are to tourist pamphlets and a single sentence in a book. ScienceApologist (talk) 05:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No explanation of who this G. Porutis was who first described this as long ago as wait, 2006 - that long ago! Not notable in any meaningful way without mention by a primary reliable source. Mfield (talk) 06:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.  —Artw (talk) 06:39, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. A non-notable fringe theory. Admiral Norton (talk) 15:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per all the above. ClovisPt (talk) 16:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research. --Peephole (talk) 18:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - sources only point to one, obscure author. - LuckyLouie (talk) 20:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. OR. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 17:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.