Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lithuanians in France (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 09:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Lithuanians in France
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication topic meets WP:GNG. This is one of many "X people in France" articles created by a single editor and their SOCKS. See Sockpuppet investigations/Ghumen. J bh Talk  14:55, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 14:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. Rigsofrods (talk) 16:02, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for nom. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 19:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   16:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - we cannot state that "Lithuanians in France" are any less notable than Lithuanians in the United Kingdom or Lithuanians in the United States. No country is inherently any more important than another country. Based on this category, it seems there are enough notable Lithuanians in France to populate a decent article, when added to statistics about Lithuanian population in France. —Мандичка YO 😜 03:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This is based on WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:SYNTH. Are there any RS actually saying this is a significant population? As near as I can tell this is just another article created by a banned SockMaster. J bh  Talk  20:33, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 03:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unlike the many other "X in France" articles, this one doesn't even cite any sources for the claims it makes (mostly in the infobox), so I suspect it's OR as well as non-notable. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 11:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as I assessed it. The policy basis for the only keep is not as strong as the unsourced collection of limited info here. The topic may be notable with a more developed article but that is not what we have now. Legacypac (talk) 16:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.