Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Litmus7


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 06:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Litmus7

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND.  scope_creep Talk  16:20, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:22, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:22, 19 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: The article is referenced to routine listings and best-places-to-work announcements, which are classed as trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. My searches are finding no better than routine announcements and listings; in sum, a company going about its business but lacking notability. AllyD (talk) 18:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - per my PROD: Fails WP:NCORP. Sources fail WP:CORPDEPTH. shoy (reactions) 23:07, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: The updated version of the article has improved references and relevant informative content regarding the entity. The information in the article is more significant than "trivial coverage" as listed in WP:CORPDEPTH. As for notability, upon a thorough and extensive search I did find a number of entire articles regarding the company and how it is a notable entity in the relevant local and global community.
 * Significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources:
 * 1. http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/kochi/2018/jan/24/litmus7-systems-starts-operation-in-smartcity-1762849.html
 * 2. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/litmus7-systems-rated-among-50-best-places-to-work-in-it-bpm-sector/article25606863.ece
 * 3. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/events/kochi/litmus7-fort-kochi-heritage-runs-promo-held-in-the-city/articleshow/66496098.cms
 * 4. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/events/kochi/fort-kochi-heritage-run-held-today/articleshow/67112628.cms
 * 5. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/company/litmus7-systems-consulting-private-limited-/U72200KL2009PTC024392
 * 6. https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/unveiling-retailsingularity-litmus7-endeavors-to-gear-up-the-retail-world-for-the-age-of-singularity-1027863331
 * 7. https://www.siliconindia.com/yearbook/company/Litmus7SystemsConsulting-catid-8-cid-234.html/2013
 * Many Thanks Gokulh97 (talk) 06:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I would advise you to read WP:CORPDEPTH again. Ref 1 is the "the opening or closing of local branches, franchises, or shops". Ref 2 is "inclusion in lists of similar organizations, particularly in "best of", "top 100", "fastest growing" or similar lists". Ref 3 and 4 are "sponsorship of events, non-profit organizations, or volunteer work". Refs 5 and 7 are "simple listings or compilations". Ref 6 is "press releases, press kits, or similar public relations materials". None of these references establish notability. shoy (reactions) 12:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Gokulh97 is a 1-week-old account. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:42, 23 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep: This article named Litmus7 is created using all authentic references from the internet. It was not intended to create any promotion for the article-subject as you can see it was written in a very basic language without any promotional content. Its intention is to educate common people about the companies in Kerala. Being awarded as the best place to work consecutively for two years, I strongly believe this should have a place on Wikipedia. I believe, in this way, Wikipedia helps people to identify and work in organizations that match their passion and dreams. The article has got enough references from the internet. I strongly vote to keep. Much Gratitude, Prince Paul (talk) 07:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * User has conflict of interest - Note that Princepcub3 has a clear conflict of interest that they have not properly declared on their user page or on the article's talk page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Unremarkable company. Claims in the "Recognitions" section are not significant. Sources fail WP:CORPDEPTH. Fails WP:NCORP. -Lopifalko (talk) 16:32, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages nor a platform for promotion. Sources fail WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 18:20, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom,, , et al. My Google news and web searches produced almost no press coverage; most of the results were directory listings. Any book results were mere passing mentions or bibliographic citations. Press coverage, to the extent it exists, was almost all product/service announcements and coverage of business partnerships (churnalism). Doug Mehus (talk) 18:44, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.4meter4 (talk) 03:35, 27 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.