Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LittleRedBunny


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  11:21, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

LittleRedBunny

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability, other than webcam industry awards which are themselves largely of questionable notability. Trivialist (talk) 12:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:39, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:39, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:39, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 12:39, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:42, 6 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - Literally just won a heap of little-known awards. If I entered a heap of local competitions and won them, would that make me eligible for an article? Likely not. Foxnpichu (talk) 16:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The assertion of notability is a very low bar, which this article clears. The usual speedy deletion criteria (A7, G10, or G11) don't apply here.  Actual notability should be assessed based on the quality and depth of RS coverage available.  This debate needs to run its course. • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I'm a bit confused what you are trying to say? Foxnpichu (talk) 13:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - A number of the sources used in the article are journalistic pieces which give information about more than just award winning. The awards themselves are national, not local. The webcam industry is certainly niche but if webcam modelling is itself considered a notable subject it would seem reasonable that one of its highest-profile performers could be considered so too. Polly Tunnel (talk) 17:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - There is enough coverage to pass the GNG. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. The Daily Beast piece and similar coverage cited by MT look to be enough RS coverage to support this BLP. However, I've cleaned the laundry list of NN award-oids out of the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 15:12, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as per sources in the article, you may want to re-read WP:BEFORE. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.