Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Astrology Prince


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. -Scottywong | confer _ 15:35, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Little Astrology Prince

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Cannot find reliable in depth sources to establish notability. Appears to be self-promotion, as is also suggested by this edit by same editor: diff. MakeSense64 (talk) 12:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. A notable author of astrology books. 218.250.159.95 (talk) 14:18, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Being an author alone is not enough. Anything that shows he qualifies for WP:AUTHOR? MakeSense64 (talk) 16:26, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I could find no Reliable Source coverage of this person. Sources provided in the article are self-referential. Unless he is better known by some other name (perhaps the Chinese translation of Little Astrology Prince?) he is not notable. --MelanieN (talk) 03:00, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.