Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Boxes: The Architecture of a Classic Midcentury Suburb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Daly City, California. Tone 17:22, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Little Boxes: The Architecture of a Classic Midcentury Suburb

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable book, and the sources are problematic. The two Examiner cites are just passing references, and I'm not actually sure that the Examiner actually meets our criteria for a WP:reliable source. The San Mateo paper is fine, but the link is to the wrong article.

I don't beleieve this passes either WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge. Entirely suitable for a one-sentence merge into Daly_City,_California.  --Lockley (talk) 10:16, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge as nom. Preferable to deletion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 12:57, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge looks like a good solution. It's short and referenced just not enough to write a notable article. Archrogue (talk) 19:28, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge - Per WP:ATD. Sources don't support notability (WP:NBOOK / WP:GNG). --Jack Frost (talk) 07:39, 24 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.