Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Darlin's Rock n’ Roll Palace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that this music venue does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards to qualify for a standalone article. North America1000 18:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Little Darlin's Rock n’ Roll Palace

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Checking both newspaper archives and books, I see no indication that this place is anything more than a local spot with minor local coverage. There is nothing really in depth. CUPIDICAE💕 16:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — non notable location with barely any RS. I fail to see WP:NGEO being satisfied here. Celestina007 (talk) 16:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Praxidicae beat me to it by nominating this article. Minor local coverage does not meet GNG. —Kbabej (talk) 17:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Oppose deletion. A non notable location? Have you seen the amount of acts that played there? It was intrinsic to the revival of 50's and 60's music. There are plenty of linked articles to it. Minor local coverage is not an accurate way of describing it - it was shown on a few mainstream stations in the US and it's shows are available on DVD.Glaaaastonbury88 (talk) 18:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If we had an article on everywhere a notable person went, this wouldn't be an encyclopedia, it would be a fan site. There is zero in depth coverage of the venue. CUPIDICAE💕  18:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge to the Old Town amusement park article, not notable enough by itself. Oaktree b (talk) 01:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi CUPIDICAE💕, no offence, but I don't know what to make about your replies. Writing things like 'There is zero in depth coverage of the venue' is simply not true and a crass generalisation. It adds nothing when there is a series of televised shows providing in depth coverage as well as numerous articles proving it was a notable place. A merge at the very least would be an idea, however I think the venue deserves it's own page and I have added more sources to the article. Thank you.Glaaaastonbury88 (talk) 08:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You're free to feel however you want but it's neither crass nor a generalization to say that there is no in-depth coverage of the venue. There isn't. I'm obviously open to being proven wrong but that requires you to provide independent reliable sources (not fan blogs, nostalgia sites or "look who played here in 19xx!" fan-cruft.  CUPIDICAE💕  16:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, none of the added "sources" meet reliable sourcing guidelines to indicate significant, in depth coverage. I have no doubt that is editing in good faith, however I recommend a review of reliable sources to learn about which help with notability, and which don't.       StarM 17:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Well looks like I am fighting another losing battle here.Glaaaastonbury88 (talk) 19:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Still Oppose deletion- Ok, last try. I have reviewed the page, surely the sheer volume of artists that have played there that have televised or recorded performances to prove it and the 14 references provided are enough to establish notability? ThanksGlaaaastonbury88 (talk) 17:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * you only get one !vote, but you're welcome to comment. And no, being associated with notable subjects does not equate to notability. Please read WP:INHERITED CUPIDICAE💕  18:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.